In an era of increasing complexity in
Before selecting a benefits administrator, plan sponsors must carefully review the market to ensure they are receiving both the appropriate level of service and fair pricing. Running a vendor search every five to seven years is critical for fulfilling a plan sponsor's fiduciary responsibility. It's a bigger task than many plan sponsors realize, involving not only defining the scope of services, issuing a request for proposal and collecting responses, but also evaluating proposals, interviewing finalists and providing feedback to all respondents. Even if plan sponsors ultimately retain their incumbent provider, this exercise demonstrates that they've met their fiduciary duty by
Once a plan sponsor has selected a new administrator, the complex task of managing the implementation process begins. It's essential to recognize that several vendors are involved in administering H&W benefits — not just the primary benefits administrator, but also carriers and payroll platforms. On top of that, the plan sponsor's existing HR and benefits team already has full-time responsibilities, and the hours required to effectively manage such an intricate project can quickly become overwhelming. Coordinating across multiple parties — each with its own systems, processes and requirements — demands significant effort and resources that many internal teams simply don't have the capacity to handle.
Read more:
Ensuring data accuracy is fundamental to a successful transition, yet many plan sponsors underestimate the complexity of this task. Even minor data errors, such as missing dependent information or incorrect health savings account contributions, can have a significant impact on participant eligibility and compliance. Ensuring the successful transmission of all data from the prior benefits administrator's conversion files and the accurate mapping of that data to the new system is only the beginning. The converted data also needs to be thoroughly reviewed to ensure accuracy and completeness, an undertaking that requires much more than a cursory check of key files.
Experienced consultants will insist on validating data well before the system goes live so they have time to track down missing information and correct issues that could otherwise cause disruptions later on. For example, during one implementation, we identified future-dated elections in the conversion data that would have caused serious problems if not addressed. Proper data testing helps prevent these types of issues from occurring and ensures that participants receive the benefits to which they are entitled.
Even if all participant, carrier and payroll data has been validated for accuracy, plan sponsors still face the challenge of ensuring that plan requirements are correctly programmed into the new administration system. This can be difficult because plan documents — and even summary plan descriptions — can be hard to interpret and lack the specificity needed for the minutia of administration. Accurately discerning plan requirements takes a true expert with years of experience. Without significant support from the plan sponsor — or a skilled consultant working on their behalf — it's unrealistic to expect the incoming benefits administrator to get it all right. In addition, once plan requirements have been defined and programmed, the system must undergo rigorous testing to ensure it functions as expected.
The success of any H&W benefits implementation depends not only on data and system accuracy, but also on delivering a seamless user experience for employees and retirees. If the system is difficult to navigate, participants may struggle with accessing their benefits, leading to frustration or missed opportunities. Thorough testing of the user interface is essential to ensure the system is intuitive and easy to use — from login to benefits enrollment. This includes testing links and single sign-on connections between the benefits administration system, the company intranet and any connected vendor portals.
Read more:
Equally important is preparing the service center to handle participant inquiries. Reviewing the service center's knowledgebase content in advance and running through call simulations with representatives ensures that they are equipped to provide accurate information and resolve issues quickly. After go-live, ongoing call monitoring allows plan sponsors to ensure that representatives continue to deliver expected levels of service, address any knowledge gaps, and handle participant questions with confidence and accuracy.
Effective communication is key to a successful participant experience. Without clear promotion of the new system and detailed instructions for accessing the website and service center, participants are likely to become frustrated. A comprehensive communication strategy should not only provide technical instructions but also build excitement and awareness about the new system's benefits.
This can be achieved through a variety of channels, such as on-site presentations, webinars (with recordings made available for those who can't attend), postcards, emails and hard-copy mailings. By offering multiple touchpoints, plan sponsors can ensure participants understand how to use the system and feel confident navigating it. The clearer the communication, the more smoothly participants will transition to the new platform, reducing confusion and maximizing engagement.
Another major challenge for plan sponsors is managing open enrollment during an ongoing implementation. With implementation timelines often stretching from six to 18 months, it's common for at least one open enrollment period to occur before the new system is fully operational.
Read more:
Careful planning and coordination of both the outgoing and incoming vendors is a must. This coordination rarely happens directly; it usually falls to the plan sponsor or their consultant to manage the transition through separate communications. A detailed transition plan documenting key hand-offs, such as the final payroll instruction file from the outgoing vendor and the first from the incoming vendor, is essential to avoid disruptions and ensure nothing is missed, including unresolved support tickets or active appeals.
One successful approach involves launching the new system several months ahead of open enrollment, allowing participants to familiarize themselves with the platform and enabling the team to address any technical issues before the enrollment period begins. Third-party implementation support can help facilitate this process while allowing the internal benefits team to remain focused on its day-to-day responsibilities.
Although third-party implementation consultants are typically engaged by plan sponsors, their role is to facilitate success for all parties involved. By managing the project efficiently, consultants help vendors meet their own service objectives, leading to stronger, longer-term partnerships with their clients. The plan sponsor, in turn, benefits from a well-coordinated implementation and a system that delivers on its promises. We have seen more and more vendors recognizing the benefits of dedicated implementation support by offering invoice credits to help offset plan sponsors' consulting expenses.
The cost of expert guidance is minimal compared to the potential fallout of a failed implementation. Plan sponsors who attempt to manage a benefits system implementation on their own — or who hire a consultant with insufficient experience — often encounter unexpected challenges that lead to delays, errors and dissatisfied participants. But with the right support, plan sponsors can trust that their implementation will not only meet their needs, but also drive increased participant engagement satisfaction, setting the stage for long-term success.
