Companies are dragging their feet on reskilling and upskilling their workforce because the cost is too high. But if they don’t, the potential loss is far greater.
A recent
It’s clear that employers are not easily convinced to allocate a budget for building new skills, despite the potential to attract top talent, according to Thanos Papangelis, co-founder and CEO of Epignosis. And even when they do, they don’t give their programs enough money.
“Measuring the effect of upskilling training may seem challenging and some companies are not inclined to invest in anything they can’t precisely measure,” Papangelis says.
Read more:
The cost of reskilling — which includes funding learning design, training materials and subject matter expertise — is approximately $24,800 per person in the United States, according to a 2019 paper from the World Economic Forum and Boston Consulting Group. This start-up cost, along with the time it would take to implement these programs, is the leading factor behind the lack of training.
But their hesitation is costing them regardless: high turnover and new hires cost the average 100-person company approximately $660,000 to $2.6 million per year, according to a study conducted by Gallup.
Read More:
“Many companies don’t realize but cutting employee training costs can be financially detrimental and yield much higher costs in the long run,” Papangelis says. “Employees value learning opportunities, but when they are not provided as an opportunity to optimize their skills and abilities they’re
For employers that are still unsure about where and how to spend their money, training their employee base doesn’t necessarily have to be a costly venture, Papangelis says. There are cost-effective — and equally thorough — implementations that will achieve the same result.